Quarterly ICP Reviews
An ICP that's never updated is a liability. Markets shift, products evolve, and your best customers today may not look like your best customers from 18 months ago. A quarterly ICP review keeps your targeting calibrated to current reality.
What to Review Each Quarter
Closed-won analysis: Pull all deals closed in the quarter and look for patterns that differ from your current ICP definition. Did you win more deals in a new vertical? Are you seeing more traction in a different company size band? Are there technology stack patterns you didn't anticipate?
Churn and expansion analysis: Which customer cohorts are churning, and which are expanding? ICP should optimize for long-term revenue, not just initial close rate. If a particular segment closes well but churns at 30% annually, it belongs in your exclusion list, not your ICP.
Competitive win/loss: If you're consistently losing to the same competitor in a specific segment, that segment may not belong in your ICP — at least not yet. If you're consistently winning in a segment where you didn't expect to, expand your ICP to include it.
The Review Process
Hold a 90-minute quarterly ICP review with sales leadership, marketing, and customer success. Pull the data in advance. Run through closed-won, churn/expansion, and win/loss. Make specific, documented changes to the ICP definition. Communicate the changes to the full GTM team within a week.
Versioning Your ICP
Keep a dated version history of your ICP definitions. When you find that a filter change improved your close rate by 12%, you want to know exactly what you changed and when. Use a shared document with version dates and change notes.
- Run a 90-minute ICP review with sales, marketing, and CS every quarter
- Optimize for LTV, not just close rate — high-churn segments don't belong in ICP
- Keep a versioned history of ICP changes with dates and rationale
- Communicate ICP updates to the full GTM team within a week of the review